Northwestern Indiana Telephone Company - Page 34

                                               - 34 -                                                  
                         J.  Certain Legal Expenses Which NITCO Paid                                   

                  During the years in issue, NITCO paid substantial fees to                            
            various attorneys and law firms in connection with certain legal                           
            proceedings and other legal matters.  Most of the legal expenses                           
            that are in dispute between the parties are attributable to                                
            proceedings that were commenced before the FCC in 1983,                                    
            concerning whether NICATV (the cable television company Rhys                               
            owned) was an affiliate of NITCO or are attributable to                                    
            subsequent related legal proceedings that were brought as a                                
            result of the FCC proceedings.                                                             

            Divestiture Action                                                                         

                  On October 13, 1983, another cable television company that                           
            was a competitor of NICATV filed a complaint with the FCC against                          
            Rhys Mussman d/b/a NICATV and NITCO.  The complaint alleged that                           
            NICATV and NITCO were affiliated companies engaged in                                      
            discriminatory and anticompetitive conduct in violation of the                             
            Communications Act and the FCC's telephone company/cable                                   
            television company cross-ownership rules.6  In its complaint, the                          
            other cable television company sought damages and a cease and                              


            6The FCC’s cross-ownership rules generally prohibited a                                    
            local telephone company from offering cable television services                            
            to the viewing public within its telephone service area, either                            
            directly or indirectly through an affiliated company.  The FCC’s                           
            rules broadly defined affiliation to include any financial or                              
            business relationship between the telephone company and the cable                          
            television company, except the common carrier-user relationship.                           



Page:  Previous  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011