Susan J. Bokhari O'Neil - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          expenses, a record of a business purpose and relationship for               
          these items is conspicuously absent.  Furthermore, petitioner's             
          testimony in this regard was vague and unhelpful.  Thus, we find            
          that, other than as allowed by respondent, petitioner has failed            
          to substantiate the deductions claimed for car transportation,              
          parking, meals and entertainment, and gifts, as required by                 
          section 274 and the regulations thereunder.                                 
               We also find that, although a deduction for tax preparation            
          fees is generally available to taxpayers under section 212,                 
          petitioner has failed to present any evidence to corroborate the            
          deduction claimed for such an expense on her Schedule A.                    
          Section 6662(a) Penalty                                                     
               Respondent determined an accuracy-related penalty under                
          section 6662(a) with respect to petitioner's 1991 Federal income            
          tax return for negligence or disregard of rules or regulations.             
               In pertinent part, section 6662 imposes an accuracy-related            
          penalty equal to 20 percent of the portion of an underpayment of            
          tax that is attributable to negligence or disregard of rules or             
          regulations.  Sec. 6662(a), (c).  Section 6662(c) defines                   
          "negligence" as including any failure to make a reasonable                  
          attempt to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue               
          Code, and defines "disregard" as including any careless,                    
          reckless, or intentional disregard.                                         
               Petitioner failed to offer any evidence to rebut                       
          respondent's determination of an accuracy-related penalty in this           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011