- 25 - (1988); Harwood v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 239, 258 (1984), affd. without published opinion 786 F.2d 1174 (9th Cir. 1986); Velvet Horn, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1981-227. We accordingly shall consider whether use of the cash method of accounting to report Vineyards' income from the sales of grapes and other property materially distorted its income. We note at the outset that the Groths were the general partners of Vineyards and held an 85-percent interest in the partnership, with trusts for the benefit of each of their children holding the remaining 15-percent interest. At relevant times, the Groths also owned at least 90 percent of the stock of Winery, with Mr. Venge holding at most 10 percent.5 As stated above, the fact that the Groths controlled both Vineyards and Winery requires that we carefully scrutinize the transactions between them. We note at the outset that Vineyards and Winery did not deal with one another on the same terms as they dealt with unrelated parties. Although Vineyards sold grapes to unrelated parties and to Winery at market value, unrelated parties generally paid Vineyards for grapes within 6 months of harvest. The written sales agreements pursuant to which Vineyards sold grapes to unrelated parties that were written on Winery's letterhead generally provided that the buyer would pay 50 percent of the 5 Pursuant to the employment contract between the Groths and Mr. Venge, Mr. Venge acquired 10 percent of the stock of Winery between 1985 and 1989.Page: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011