Eliane Olson - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         

               On June 10, 1993, the Court entered an Order and Order of              
          Dismissal and Decision (the final order) in the partnership                 
          proceeding.  The final order dismissed the partnership proceeding           
          and sustained respondent's adjustments as determined in the FPAA.           
               On August 29, 1994, a computational adjustment was assessed            
          against petitioner.  The computational adjustment was made to               
          record the change in petitioner's tax liability resulting from              
          the Court's final order dismissing the partnership proceeding and           
          sustaining the partnership items relating to Computer Graphics              
          for 1982.  See sec. 6226(h).                                                
               The Affected Items Proceeding                                          
               On August 26, 1994, respondent mailed petitioner a notice of           
          deficiency in which respondent determined that, for 1982,                   
          petitioner was liable for additions to tax for negligence under             
          section 6653(a)(1) and 6653(a)(2) and an addition to tax for a              
          substantial understatement of income tax under section 6661.                
          These additions to tax are affected items because they are based            
          on tax owing by petitioner as a result of adjustments to                    
          partnership items appearing on Computer Graphics' partnership               
          return for 1982.                                                            
               Petitioner timely filed a petition for redetermination with            
          respect to the affected items notice of deficiency.  In the                 
          petition, petitioner claims that she is entitled to relief as an            







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011