P & X Markets, Inc. - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          with respect thereto.  The second and third causes alleged that             
          some of the Defendants had maliciously prosecuted two lawsuits              
          against petitioner for unlawful detainer.  The Complaint prayed             
          for special damages totaling $17,864, general damages for injury            
          to reputation in amounts to be proven at trial, and punitive                
          damages.  The fourth cause alleged that some of the Defendants              
          had intentionally interfered with the business relationship of              
          petitioner and its customers.  The Complaint prayed for lost                
          profits in an amount to be proven at trial, but not to exceed               
          $2.8 million, and punitive damages.  The fifth cause alleged that           
          some of the Defendants had made fraudulent representations to               
          petitioner with respect to certain payments.  The Complaint                 
          prayed for accounting fees and punitive damages.  The sixth cause           
          alleged that some of the Defendants had violated fiduciary and              
          statutory duties owed to petitioner with respect to the lease.              
          The Complaint prayed for petitioner’s out-of-pocket losses, as              
          well as punitive damages.  The Complaint also prayed for                    
          prejudgment interest and costs with respect to all six causes of            
          action.                                                                     
               The Defendants denied all material allegations in the                  
          Complaint.  Some of the Defendants filed a cross-complaint for              
          unspecified amounts allegedly due under the lease.                          
               On or about June 28, 1990, petitioner and the Defendants               
          settled the lawsuit through the Agreement.  The Agreement stated            
          that petitioner would receive $850,000.  The Agreement did not              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011