- 7 - the date of such dissolution." (Emphasis added.) The effect of this and its predecessor statute is to preserve remedies for pre- dissolution claims and liabilities only. Petitioner's liability for deficiencies in income tax for the years 1990 and 1991 arose only after the filing of the respective returns. See sec. 6901(b). The notice of deficiency issued by respondent therefore relates to post-dissolution liabilities. In Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp., 620 S.W.2d 547, 549- 550 (Tex. 1981), the Supreme Court of Texas noted that, at common law, dissolution terminated the legal existence of a corporation. Once dissolved, a corporation could neither sue nor be sued, and all legal proceedings in which it was a party abated. The court considered the possibility that some principle of equity, separate and apart from article 7.12 and its predecessor, might keep alive a cause of action against a corporation for post- dissolution liabilities. The court found that the effect of the statutes enacted prior to the enactment of article 7.12 in 1955 was: to supplant the equitable trust theory by declaring a statutory equivalent. * * * We find no indication that the legislature intended for Article 7.12 to be interpreted any differently. * * * Therefore Article 7.12 expresses a legislative policy to restrict the use of the trust fund theory to pre-dissolution claims. * * * [Id. at 550-551; fn. ref. omitted.]Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011