16 Commissioner, 58 T.C. 1055, 1058 (1972), affd. without published opinion 474 F.2d 1345 (5th Cir. 1973). Petitioners have failed to introduce any evidence that the payment of legal fees was intended by PGWV to serve as compensation or salary to Mr. Peters. Accordingly, PGWV is not allowed to deduct the payment of the legal fees as compensation to Peters. 3. Whether a Portion of the Firm's Expense Was an Allowable Deduction to Peters Last, we must decide whether the expenses incurred were deductible by Peters.6 Under section 212(1), individuals may deduct all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the tax year for the production or collection of income. Our analysis is similar to that used for section 162(a), the difference being that the profit-seeking or income-producing activity need not amount to a trade or business. Johnson v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 340, 347 (1979). Accordingly, the expense must meet four basic elements: (a) Payment of the legal fees must be ordinary; (b) it must be necessary; (c) they must be paid or incurred during the tax year by the taxpayer; and (d) the expense must arise in connection with, or proximately result from the taxpayer's profit-seeking activity. O'Malley v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 352, 361 (1988). 6 This issue was raised in this case by petitioners Peters.Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011