Scott R. Philips - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         

          Commissioner, supra at 406-407.  The matters set forth in the               
          above-quoted paragraph consist solely of stale and time-worn tax            
          protester rhetoric.  Because the above-quoted paragraph is                  
          frivolous and immaterial, we order such paragraph stricken from             
          the petition.  Rule 152; see Allen v. Commissioner, supra.  Trial           
          in this case, if necessary, will be limited to the factual issues           
          concerning petitioner's receipt or nonreceipt of income; the                
          amount, if any, of the deficiency; and the applicability of the             
          additions to tax.                                                           
          Finally, we turn to respondent's motion to impose a penalty                 
          against petitioner under section 6673.  As relevant herein,                 
          section 6673(a)(1) authorizes the Tax Court to require the                  
          taxpayer to pay to the United States a penalty not in excess of             
          $25,000 whenever it appears that the proceedings have been                  
          instituted or maintained by the taxpayer primarily for delay or             
          that the taxpayer's position in such proceeding is frivolous or             
          groundless.                                                                 
               We note that this is not the first time petitioner has                 
          appeared before this Court to advance tax protester claims.  See            
          Philips v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-540.  At that time, the            
          Court explained to petitioner that his arguments, which are                 
          similar to those raised here in the above-quoted paragraph of the           
          petition, are frivolous tax protester claims.  Indeed, the Court            







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011