Paul A. Rendina and Janet Mae Rendina - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         

          II.  De Facto Liquidation                                                   
               Applying the three-pronged test of Estate of Maguire v.                
          Commissioner, 50 T.C. 130, 140 (1968): (1) Whether there is a               
          manifest intention to liquidate; (2) whether there is a                     
          continuing purpose to terminate corporate affairs; and (3)                  
          whether the activities of the corporation and its shareholders              
          are directed toward that objective, we are convinced that WSAI              
          and its shareholders displayed a manifest intention to liquidate            
          and continuing purpose to terminate corporate affairs, and that             
          the activities of WSAI and its shareholders were directed to that           
          end.  See Olmsted v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1984-381.                     
               Neither the Code nor the regulations to section 331 define             
          the term “complete liquidation.”  However, as we noted in Olmsted           
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1984-381, the regulations under                 
          section 332 (governing subsidiary liquidations) contain a                   
          definition of “complete liquidation” under section 332 that                 
          applies equally to section 331:                                             
               A status of liquidation exists when the corporation                    
               ceases to be a going concern and its activities are                    
               merely for the purpose of winding up its affairs,                      
               paying its debts and distributing any remaining balance                
               to its shareholders.  A liquidation may be completed                   
               prior to the actual dissolution of the liquidating                     
               corporation.  However, legal dissolution of the                        
               corporation is not required.  Nor will the mere                        
               retention of a nominal amount of assets for the sole                   
               purpose of preserving the corporation’s legal existence                
               disqualify the transaction.  [Sec. 1.332-2(c), Income                  
               Tax Regs.]                                                             






Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011