- 2 - lease term, providing that the amount of rent to be paid by A for the first 11.5 months of the lease term was zero (11.5-month period of zero rent) and spec- ifying the amounts and due dates of the rent to be paid by A over the 24 years of the lease term following that 11.5-month period. The agreement under which A sold B a 35-percent interest in the building required, inter alia, that P deliver to Lender a letter of credit naming Lender as beneficiary (Lender letter of credit) in order to secure P's obligations under the loan and that A deliver to P a letter of credit naming P as beneficiary (P letter of credit) in order to secure P's obligations under the Lender letter of credit. In order to service the loan during the 11.5-month period of zero rent, A and B agreed in the partnership agree- ment to make additional capital contributions to P on the first day of each month during the last 11 months of that period. Respondent concedes that if the Court were to find that the 11.5-month period of zero rent qualifies as a reasonable rent holiday described in sec. 467(b)(5)(C), I.R.C.,1 P would be entitled for 1988 to accrue rent under the lease pursuant to the terms of the lease (respondent's concession). Held: The 11.5-month period of zero rent quali- fies as a reasonable rent holiday described in sec. 467(b)(5)(C). Accordingly, pursuant to respondent's concession, P shall accrue rent for 1988 in accordance with the lease as provided in sec. 467(b)(1)(A). Held, further: The lease did not allocate rent to the 11.5-month period of zero rent in an amount equal to the P letter of credit, and P is not required for 1988 to accrue as rent the amount of that letter of credit. Clark Reed Nichols and Cheryl A. Chevis, for petitioner. Gerald W. Douglas, for respondent. 1 All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for 1988. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011