Reza and Connie M. Rezazadeh - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         

          a debt, and its characteristic was not changed by the transfer of           
          the judgment to petitioner.                                                 
               In support of his argument that the debt was a business                
          debt, petitioner cited numerous cases in which advances to                  
          corporations by employees and/or shareholder-employees were found           
          to constitute business bad debts:  Fitzpatrick v. Commissioner,             
          T.C. Memo. 1967-1; Litwin v. United States, 67 AFTR 2d 91-1098,             
          91-1 USTC par. 50,229 (D. Kan. 1991), affd. 983 F.2d 997 (10th              
          Cir. 1993); Baldwin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-433; Trent             
          v. Commissioner, 291 F.2d 669 (2d Cir. 1961), revg. 34 T.C. 910             
          (1960); Lundgren v. Commissioner, 376 F.2d 623 (9th Cir. 1967),             
          revg. T.C. Memo. 1965-314; Kelson v. United States, 73-2 USTC               
          par. 9565 (C.D. Utah 1973), Stratmore v. United States, 292 F.              
          Supp. 59 (D. N.J. 1968), revd. 420 F.2d 461 (3d Cir. 1970); Jaffe           
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1967-215; Litterio v. Commissioner,             
          T.C. Memo. 1992-524, affd. without published opinion 21 F.3d 423            
          (4th Cir. 1994).  The Court has considered these cases and                  
          concludes these cases are not inconsistent with the holding in              
          this case.  The cases cited by petitioner recite the same                   
          principles set forth in this opinion:  that a debt will be                  
          characterized as a business debt rather than as a nonbusiness               
          debt if the debt bears a proximate relationship to the taxpayer's           
          trade or business and that the determination of such a                      
          relationship is a question of fact.  This Court is satisfied that           





Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011