Donald G. Russell - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

          "compensation" for purposes of calculating the allowable                    
          deduction for a contribution to an Individual Retirement Account            
          (IRA) under section 219(b).2                                                
               Some of the facts have been stipulated, and those facts,               
          with the annexed exhibits, are so found and are incorporated                
          herein by reference.  At the time the petition was filed,                   
          petitioner's legal residence was Northport, New York.                       
               During 1992, petitioner earned $306.26 in taxable wages,               
          $299.36 in taxable interest, $106 for jury duty service, and                
          received $10,660 in unemployment compensation.  Petitioner                  
          properly reported all of this income on his 1992 Federal income             
          tax return (return).                                                        
               Petitioner contributed $2,000 to an IRA in 1992 and claimed            
          a contribution deduction for this amount on his 1992 return.  In            
          the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed $1,694 of                   
          petitioner's IRA contribution deduction, the amount by which the            
          deduction exceeded his taxable wages of $306.26.                            
               In calculating the amount of the contribution deduction,               
          petitioner considered the unemployment benefits he received in              
          1992 to be "compensation", as that term is used in section                  
          219(b)(1)(B).  Respondent contends that unemployment benefits do            


          2                                                                           
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent made adjustments to            
          petitioner's medical and miscellaneous expense deductions.  These           
          adjustments are computational and will be resolved by the Court's           
          holding on the issue in this case.                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011