Jacqueline Sable, a.k.a. Jacqueline Sabal - Page 2

                                           - 2 -                                             

          filed within the 90-day period prescribed by section 6213(a)1 as                   
          augmented by section 7502 and the regulations thereunder.                          
                The notice of deficiency in this case was mailed on May 24,                  
          1996.  The 90-day period under section 6213(a) for timely filing                   
          a petition expired on Thursday, August 22, 1996.  Petitioner's                     
          petition was properly addressed and mailed2 to the Tax Court in a                  
          large envelope bearing a privately metered postmark dated August                   
          20, 1996.  The postmark also indicates the origin of mailing as                    
          Fort Lauderdale, Florida.3  The petition was received and filed                    
          by the Court on August 26, 1996, 4 days beyond the period for                      
          filing prescribed by section 6213(a).                                              
                Generally, the Court does not have jurisdiction over a case                  
          unless the petition is filed within the 90 days allowed by                         
          section 6213(a).  Under section 7502, however, some relief is                      
          provided in those cases where the petition is mailed within the                    
          90-day period but received for filing after the expiration of                      
          that period.  Section 7502(a) provides that the date of the U.S.                   


                1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to                   
          the Internal Revenue Code as amended.                                              
                2The petition was mailed to the Court by certified mail.                     
          However, this does not afford petitioner any relief, since the                     
          regulation dealing with certified mail, sec. 301.7502-1(c)(2),                     
          Proced. & Admin. Regs., applies only if the taxpayer has an                        
          employee of the U.S. Postal Service postmark the sender's                          
          receipt.  There is no evidence that this was done here.                            
                3The petition lists petitioner's residence as Pompano Beach,                 
          Florida.                                                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011