Steven J. and Michele D. Scagliotta - Page 8

                                           - 8 -                                             

          any amount out of these proceeds to be applied to his claims                       
          against the estate.                                                                
                During 1990, petitioner was employed on a full-time basis                    
          with United Energy Services Corp. doing work in the field of                       
          information systems.  He reported salary and wage income of                        
          $74,154.61 from his employer for 1990.                                             
                On their 1990 Federal income tax return, petitioners                         
          reported on Schedule C, Profit or Loss from Business, income of                    
          zero, expenses of $37,726, and a net loss of $37,726 from CIS.                     
          Included in the amount of expenses claimed was a business bad                      
          debt deduction of $12,500 representing a portion of the                            
          $52,962.95 loans and advances by petitioner to Ms. Marshall.                       
          Petitioner included the bad debt deduction on Schedule C for CIS                   
          because he contends that CIS is a business that includes both his                  
          non-rental-related activities, with respect to the Bridgewater                     
          and Clinton properties, and his rental-related activities, with                    
          respect to the property he and Ms. Marshall owned in Knoxville.                    
          However, petitioners reported the rental income and other                          
          expenses from the properties in Knoxville on Schedules E,                          
          Supplemental Income and Loss, of their 1990 Federal income tax                     
          return.                                                                            
                In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed all of                    
          the expenses claimed by petitioners on Schedule C of their 1990                    
          return.  Respondent determined that petitioners were not entitled                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011