John W. and Vincentia Schwartz - Page 9

                                             9                                               
                the regulation at issue is explicit in defining precisely                    
                what partnership items are to be considered in making such a                 
                determination. * * * (i) Items of income, gain, loss,                        
                deduction, or credit of the partnership; (ii) Expenditures                   
                by the partnership not deductible in computing its taxable                   
                income (for example, charitable contributions); (iii) Items                  
                of the partnership which may be tax preference items under                   
                section 57(a) for any partner; [and] (iv) Income of the                      
                partnership exempt from tax; Thus, in defining same share                    
                the regulation disregarded as a partnership item under                       
                section 301.6231(a)(3)-1(a), Proced. & Admin. Regs.,                         
                partnership liabilities; other amounts determinable at the                   
                partnership level with respect to partnership assets,                        
                investments, transactions and operations; guaranteed                         
                payments; optional adjustments to basis of partnership                       
                property pursuant to an election under section 754; and                      
                items relating to contributions to the partnership,                          
                distributions from the partnership, and transactions to                      
                which section 707(a) applies to the extent that it is                        
                determined that the partnership is under an obligation.                      
                Sec. 301.6231(a)(3)-1(a)(1)(v) through (4), Proced. & Admin.                 
                Regs.  [Emphasis added.]                                                     
          McKnight v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. at 184-185.                                      
                We stated that the small partnership exception to the TEFRA                  
          provisions "sought to establish that the partnerships which would                  
          realize such exception were those whose members 'treat themselves                  
          as co-ownerships rather than partnerships, as each co-owner                        
          resolves his own tax responsibilities separately as an individual                  
          with the IRS.'"  Id. at 185 (quoting Tax Compliance Act of 1982                    
          and Related Legislation:  Hearings on H.R. 6300 Before the House                   
          Committee on Ways and Means, 97th Cong., 2d Sess. 259-261                          
          (1982)). Thus, the intent of Congress in establishing the same                     
          share rule of section 6231(a)(1)(B)(i)(II) was to ensure that                      
          only "simple" partnerships would be excepted from the TEFRA                        
          provisions.                                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011