- 8 - that they exhausted their administrative remedies within the meaning of section 7430(b)(1);3 that they did not unreasonably protract the proceedings within the meaning of section 7430(b)(4); and that their claimed costs are reasonable, sec. 7430(c)(1) and (2). These requirements are in the conjunctive. Minahan v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 492, 497 (1987). Petitioners must prove each and every requirement. Rule 232(e); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933); Nalle v. Commissioner, 55 F.3d 189, 191 (5th Cir. 1995), affg. T.C. Memo. 1994-182; Lennox v. Commissioner, 998 F.2d 244, 248 (5th Cir. 1993), revg. in part T.C. Memo. 1992-382; Gantner v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 192, 197 (1989), affd. 905 F.2d 241 (8th Cir. 1990). Respondent agrees that petitioners have met all of the above requirements except two. Respondent disputes petitioners' contention that her position was not substantially justified, and respondent argues that some of petitioners' claimed costs are not reasonable. 2. Whether Respondent's Position was Substantially Justified Whether respondent's position was substantially justified turns on a finding of reasonableness, based on all the facts and circumstances of the case, as well as any legal precedents which may relate thereto. Wilkerson v. United States, supra at 119; Nalle v. Commissioner, supra at 191; Coastal Petroleum Refiners, 3 This requirement only applies to an award of reasonable litigation costs. Sec. 7430(b)(1).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011