- 4 - examination of his income tax returns for the taxable years at issue. Respondent, using the bank deposits method, determined that petitioners had understated gross receipts and overstated various business expense deductions for the years at issue. Respondent further determined that petitioners had unreported capital gain in the amount of $38,700 from the sale of stock in 1990. Petitioners did not stipulate any facts prior to trial, provided no documentary evidence other than their returns for the taxable years at issue, and called no witnesses other than Mr. Sindik, who did testify on behalf of himself and Mrs. Sindik. Petitioner testified that he knows exactly the amount of money he makes on every business transaction, but when asked by the Court if he had any books reflecting these amounts, petitioner stated: “I don’t keep books”. Gross Receipts The first issue for our decision is whether petitioners understated gross receipts from Mr. Sindik’s business for taxable years 1988, 1989, and 1990, in the amounts determined by respondent. Respondent claims that petitioner failed to keep adequate records and as a result respondent reconstructed petitioners’ income for the years at issue using the bank deposits method. It is well established that where a taxpayer fails to maintain adequate records, the Commissioner may prove thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011