Frederick E. Slater - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          the Fifth Amendment.  Petitioner's contentions have been recently           
          addressed and rejected in Louis v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-           
          257, and Ward v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-286.  Without                
          recanvassing our complete analysis of the problem in Louis, we              
          think it is sufficient to note that we there called attention to            
          a very recent Ninth Circuit case that dealt with the issue,                 
          Grimes v. Commissioner, 82 F.3d 286, 289-290 (9th Cir., Apr. 17,            
          1996), where it was stated:                                                 
               Grimes argues that the imposition of fraud penalties                   
               renders the proceeding quasi-criminal.  Two recent                     
               Supreme Court cases addressing the definition of                       
               "punishment" for the purposes of the Double Jeopardy                   
               Clause give this argument a superficial appeal.  See                   
               Department of Revenue v. Kurth Ranch,     U.S.    ,                    
               , 114 S. Ct. 1937, 1948 (1994) (finding that a Montana                 
               state tax on marijuana constitutes punishment); United                 
               States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435 (1989) (the "civil"                     
               label does not determine whether a sanction is                         
               punishment).                                                           
                    Both of these decisions, however, cite with                       
               approval Helvering v. Mitchell, [38-1 USTC � 9152], 303                
               U.S. 391 (1938), where the Court found the Tax Code's                  
               civil fraud penalty remedial in nature and not punitive                
               for double jeopardy purposes.  See Kurth Ranch,                        
               U.S.    ,    , 114 S. Ct. at 1946 n. 16; Halper, 490                   
               U.S. at 442-43 * * *  [Fn. ref. omitted.]                              
          And the Sixth Circuit even more recently reached the same result.           
          United States v. Alt, 83 F.3d 779 (6th Cir., May 15, 1996).  We             
          reject petitioner's double jeopardy argument.                               
          2.  Section 6661                                                            
               The only year now in controversy to which section 6661                 
          applies is 1987.  Section 6661 provides:                                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011