- 10 - respondent is essentially placed in the posture of a stakeholder in trying to protect the revenue by resolving the question as to which party is ultimately responsible for the tax liability. See Estate of Goodall v. Commissioner, supra at 781, 784; L.C. Bohart Plumbing & Heating, Co. v. Commissioner, supra at 616. Conclusion Material facts remain in dispute as to whether the subject distributions were made pursuant to valid QRDOs. We shall deny petitioner's motion for partial summary judgment. We have considered all of petitioner's arguments for a contrary holding and, to the extent not addressed above, have found them to be without merit. To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order will be issued granting respondent's motion for continuance of trial and denying petitioner's motion for partial summary judgment.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: May 25, 2011