Estate of John T. Sobota, Deceased, T.J. Sobota, Personal Representative - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
               bequeathed or devised to them less the following                       
               recurrent and other ordinary expenses attributable to                  
               the specific property: * * * other expenses of                         
               management and operation of the property.                              
                    2.  To all other legatees and devisees, * * * the                 
               balance of the income, less the balance of the                         
               recurrent and other ordinary expenses attributable to                  
               all other property from which the estate is entitled to                
               income, the distribution to be in proportion to their                  
               respective interests in the property at the time of                    
               distribution and based upon the value of the property                  
               at the date of death.                                                  

               Clearly, our first point of reference is the will.  In                 
          determining what the will provides, we follow the guidelines                
          established by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin:                              
                    The rules for construction of provisions in a will                
               are clearly established in Wisconsin.  "The paramount                  
               object of will construction is the ascertainment of the                
               testatrix's intent."  The determination of testamentary                
               intent is a question of state law.  When considering                   
               the language of the will, the words must be given their                
               common and ordinary meaning unless something in the                    
               will suggests otherwise.  Unambiguous language in a                    
               will must be given effect as it is written without                     
               regard to the consequences.  [In re Will of Cooney, 541                
               N.W.2d 467, 471 (Wis. 1995); citations omitted.]                       
               Further, under Wisconsin law, we should be reluctant to                
          interpret a will in a manner enlarging the marital deduction                
          unless there is express indication in the will to do so.  Greene            
          v. United States, 476 F.2d at 119; see also Commissioner v.                 
          Estate of Bosch, 387 U.S. at 464.                                           
               The parties are in agreement that the will provision                   
          governing administration expenses applies to the personal                   
          representative's fee involved herein (i.e., the equivalent of an            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011