- 6 - petitioner testified that, while she had the opportunity to ask questions during these meetings, she did not do so. On July 12, 1988, a Form 906, Closing Agreement On Final Determination Covering Specific Matters, relating to Progressive Properties was executed. Pursuant to that agreement petitioner agreed to be bound by the final decision in Finkelman v. Commis- sioner, T.C. Memo 1989-72, affd. without published opinion 937 F.2d 612 (9th Cir. 1991). Also on July 12, 1988, another Form 906 was executed, this one relating to Oxnard Properties. Pursuant to this Form 906, petitioner agreed to be bound by the final decision in Finkelman v. Commissioner, supra. Amongst other issues, Finkelman had at issue the deductibility of losses from investment in Oxnard Properties and Progressive Properties. Once again, petitioner testified that she signed the Form 906 simply because she was instructed by her husband's secretary to do so. On February 16, 1989, this Court filed an opinion holding that the losses generated by certain partnerships, including Oxnard Properties and Progressive Properties, were disallowed. Id. OPINION When a husband and wife file a joint Federal income tax return, liability for the tax due is joint and several. Sec. 6013(d)(3). However, an "innocent spouse" can find relief under the provisions of section 6013(e). In order to invoke the provisions of section 6013(e), the spouse seeking relief mustPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011