Southern Boiler Sales & Service, Inc. - Page 20

                                       - 20 -                                         
          Berry's testimony nor the bank statement established that there             
          was any amount that should be shifted out of the taxable year               
          ended July 31, 1990, as petitioner asserts.  The Court then                 
          declined to receive No. 2's August 1989 bank statement into                 
          evidence.  The document had no probative value.  Moreover, while            
          alleging error for its taxable year ended July 31, 1990,                    
          petitioner failed to address the fact that, under its theory, if            
          gross receipts were taken out of that taxable year, they would              
          have to be included in the preceding taxable year ended July 31,            
          1989 (8-01-88 to 7-31-89), when the work was performed.8                    
               For its taxable year ended July 31, 1989, petitioner                   
          reported on its corporate tax return gross receipts of $614,178             
          and for its taxable year ended July 31, 1990, reported gross                
          receipts of $513,413.  Petitioner admitted in paragraph 5.(a) of            
          its petition that it had those gross receipts for each of those             
          years.  For its taxable year ended April 30, 1990 (5-01-89 to 4-            


          8  Petitioner's assignment of error (Pet. par. 4.(h)), its                  
          supplemental trial memorandum first identifying the August 1989             
          bank deposits as a factual dispute for trial, and its post-trial            
          brief consistently treat this issue as bank deposits made in                
          August 1989 for work performed during FYE 7-31-89 (8-01-88 to               
          7-31-89).  We note that in par. 5.(h) of the petition where                 
          petitioner alleged facts in support of its assignment of error              
          (Rule 34(b)(5)), there is some confusion as to the fiscal year or           
          years from which and to which petitioner seeks to shift gross               
          receipts.  The last sentence of par. 5.(h) seems to suggest that            
          the August 1989 bank deposits "represent income for the taxable             
          year ended July 31, 1988."  In any event, Berry was not                     
          questioned about any work performed (and/or paid for) during FYE            
          7-31-89 or during FYE 7-31-88.  No. 2 was not organized until               
          March 23, 1989.  Moreover the parties' stipulation of facts                 
          accounts for all gross receipts of both petitioner and No. 2.               



Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011