- 18 - 3. Inadequate Records 4. Failure to Supply Complete Information to Return Preparer These two badges are not affected by removal of the deemed facts from our consideration. 5. Diversion of Corporate Funds 6. Dealings In Cash Petitioner testified that her husband dealt extensively in cash as a matter of course in conducting their parking lot business. These two badges of fraud are less compelling without the deemed facts. We conclude that without the deemed facts that are not otherwise supported by the record, and based on our reevaluation of petitioner's testimony and the entire record, fraud has not been proven by clear and convincing evidence. We hold that petitioners are not liable for the addition to tax for fraud under section 6653(b) for 1975, 1976, and 1977. E. Statute of Limitations 1. Background Petitioners timely filed joint Federal income tax returns for 1975, 1976, and 1977. Petitioners reported gross income of $48,893 for 1976 and $70,708 for 1977. Twenty-five percent of those amounts are $12,223 for 1976 and $17,677 for 1977. More than 3 but less than 6 years after petitioners' returns for 1976 and 1977 were due to be filed, petitioners signed FormsPage: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011