- 9 - Dr. Ehrenworth or the Ehrenworths) may claim an exemption for Richard for 1986, 1987, and 1988 because Dr. Ehrenworth did not establish that he provided the requisite amount of support for Richard in those years. Dr. Ehrenworth's attorney, Irving Tobin, explained the support agreement to Dr. Ehrenworth. Dr. Ehrenworth understood that he agreed not to claim Andrew and Robert as exemptions. The Spectors supported Andrew in 1986, and Richard in 1986, 1987, and 1988. The Spectors provided $48 to support Robert in 1986, $6,400 in 1987, and $2,613 in 1988. OPINION A. Whether Payments From Dr. Ehrenworth to Mrs. Spector Were Alimony 1. Introduction The first issue for decision is whether payments from Dr. Ehrenworth to Mrs. Spector in 1986, 1987, and 1988 were alimony or a property settlement. A former spouse must include in gross income periodic payments received as alimony or separate maintenance. Sec. 71(a);4 Brown v. Commissioner, 50 T.C. 865, 4 Sec. 71(a)(1) provides: (1) Decree of Divorce or Separate Maintenance.-- If a wife is divorced or legally separated from her husband under a decree of divorce or of separate maintenance, the wife's gross income includes periodic payments (whether or not made at regular intervals) received after such decree in discharge of (or attributable to property transferred, in trust or otherwise, in discharge of) a legal obligation which, because of the marital or family relationship, is imposed on or incurred by the husband under the decree (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011