T.C. Memo. 1996-256 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ST. JOSEPH LEASE CAPITAL CORPORATION, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 249-95. Filed June 3, 1996. The parties have made opposing motions for summary judgment with respect to the period of limitations. Petitioner argues that a notice of deficiency returned to respondent by the U.S. Postal Service was not addressed to petitioner’s last known address and was a nullity and that a copy subsequently sent to petitioner by facsimile was a new notice that was received after the period of limitations had expired. Respondent argues that petitioner’s last known address presents a genuine issue as to a material fact but that we should deny petitioner’s motion and grant respondent’s on the grounds that petitioner received actual notice of a timely mailed notice without prejudicial delay. We agree with respondent. 1. Held: Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment will be denied. 2. Held, further, respondent's motion for partial summary judgment will be granted.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011