George and Myrsini Stotis - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          value of property other than money received.  Sec. 1001(b).  We             
          conclude that the fair market rental value of the new apartment             
          petitioner received rent free from Seawall constitutes an amount            
          realized from the disposition of his leasehold interest,                    
          receivable pro rata over the 3-year period as determined by                 
          respondent.  See Alstores Realty Corp. v. Commissioner, 46 T.C.             
          363, 374 (1966).                                                            
               Petitioner argues that the rent on the new apartment, less             
          the rent on rooms 103 and 141, multiplied by his life span                  
          constitutes "additional rent" that should offset the gain                   
          realized on the disposition of his leasehold interest.                      
          Petitioner argues, in substance, that his increased housing costs           
          should be deductible.  We do not agree.  Petitioner simply has              
          chosen a more costly apartment in which to reside.  This                    
          increased expense is a nondeductible personal expenditure.  Sec.            
          262.                                                                        
          Penalties                                                                   
               Respondent determined that petitioner is liable for a                  
          penalty for fraud under section 6663 for the taxable year 1989.             
          Section 6663(a) provides that there shall be added to the tax an            
          amount equal to 75 percent of the portion of the underpayment               
          that is attributable to fraud.  Section 6663(b) provides that if            
          the Commissioner establishes that any portion of an underpayment            
          is due to fraud, the entire underpayment is treated as                      
          attributable to fraud, unless the taxpayer proves that some                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011