Page G. Stuart - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          on behalf of petitioner at the hearing, nor did petitioner file a           
          statement with the Court pursuant to Rule 50(c).4                           
          Facts Deemed Admitted                                                       
               During 1992 and 1993, petitioner earned wage income as a               
          commercial truck driver and realized substantial income from the            
          sale of illegal drugs.                                                      
          On August 11, 1992, a Texas Highway Patrol officer stopped                  
          petitioner in his vehicle and, after obtaining petitioner's                 
          consent, searched petitioner's vehicle and found currency in the            
          amount of $316,111.  Petitioner's vehicle and the $316,111 in               
          currency were seized by, and forfeited to, the State of Texas.              
               During 1992 and 1993, the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement             
          Task Force secured and executed warrants to search petitioner's             
          residence in Nashville and other properties.  As a result of the            
          execution of these search warrants, currency was discovered and             
          seized on the dates and in the amounts as follows:                          
                    Date            Amount                                            
                         9/8/92          $120,396                                     
          9/9/92           159,227                                                    
          9/10/92          130,100                                                    
          2/6/93            50,000                                                    
          5/21/93           35,260                                                    
          6/3/93           315,000                                                    




               4  Petitioner was reminded of Rule 50(c) in the Court's                
          order.  Petitioner was advised that he could submit a written               
          statement in lieu of (or in addition to) attendance at the                  
          hearing.                                                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011