- 5 - 606 (1962), affd. 328 F.2d 662 (6th Cir. 1964). We will enforce a stipulation of settlement, whether filed or orally stipulated into the record, unless justice requires that we do otherwise. Adams v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 359, 375 (1985); Sennett v. Commissioner, 69 T.C. 694 (1978); Saigh v. Commissioner, 26 T.C. 171, 177 (1956). Petitioners ask the Court to enter a decision that reflects their claim that their 1984 self-employment income equals an amount not shown in the Stipulation. We refuse to do so. Whether petitioners incurred their claimed losses, and, if they did, whether the losses were from self-employment, raises new issues that are not before the Court. Petitioners’ pleadings make no reference to these issues, and the Stipulation is silent with respect thereto. The Stipulation does not even mention the losses that petitioners now claim to have incurred in 1984. The Stipulation speaks for itself and shows that the parties agreed to resolve this case in the manner set forth therein. The Stipulation, voluntarily entered in settlement of this lawsuit, must be given binding effect. The parties struck a bargain in the Stipulation, and petitioners must live with the benefits and burdens of it. To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order will be issued granting respondent's motionPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011