Arthur Takamoto and Louise Takamoto - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         


          an accountant to prepare the tax returns, including the Schedule            
          C for her medical practice.  Petitioner did not review the                  
          returns when she signed them.                                               
               Petitioner and Mr. Takamoto filed a joint Federal income tax           
          return for the taxable year 1979.  On that return they claimed a            
          deduction in excess of $400,000 relating to an investment in                
          First Western Government Securities.  Respondent disallowed the             
          deduction.  See Freytag v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 849 (1987),                
          affd. 904 F.2d 1011 (5th Cir. 1990), affd. 501 U.S. 868 (1991).             
          During 1984, respondent sent a notice of deficiency to petitioner           
          and Mr. Takamoto.  Petitioner recalls receiving a certified                 
          letter from the Internal Revenue Service, but never read, or was            
          otherwise informed of, its contents.  Rather, she turned the                
          letter over to Mr. Takamoto.  Mr. Takamoto hired Alan Farber (Mr.           
          Farber), an attorney, to represent petitioner and Mr. Takamoto              
          with regard to the dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.  On           
          October 24, 1984, Mr. Farber filed a petition with this Court on            
          behalf of petitioner and Mr. Takamoto challenging respondent's              
          notice of deficiency.  Petitioner and Mr. Takamoto separated in             
          1987.  In 1989, Mr. Takamoto obtained an ex-parte Mexican                   
          divorce.                                                                    
               On September 18, 1990, this Court entered a stipulated                 
          decision that a deficiency in the amount of $68,756 in Federal              
          income tax and additions to tax under sections 6653(a) and                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011