-5- married filing separately, to a personal exemption, and to the self-employment tax deduction. On September 19, 1995, we issued an order directing petitioner to file a response showing why the facts and evidence set forth in respondent's proposed stipulation of facts should not be accepted as established for the purposes of the case. On October 3, 1995, petitioner sent respondent Petitioner's Request for Admissions, which demanded answers to 21 questions of a general legal nature without any reference to the particular circumstances of this case. Petitioner's Objection To Motion To Show Cause Why Proposed Facts In Evidence Should Not Be Accepted As Established was filed on October 12, 1995. It contained a potted history of early income tax cases, culminating with some references to petitioner's efforts to file a return under section 83 that would obviate any taxable gain from his services, all of which purportedly led petitioner to conclude that his receipts were not income and that this Court had no jurisdiction over the case. It also contained various complaints about the procedures that respondent had followed in this case. On October 13, 1995, this Court filed respondent's Motion For Protective Order, which asked this Court to enter an order that respondent need not answer petitioner's request for admissions because it had been made shortly before trial, without the informal consultation required by Branerton Corp. v. Commissioner, 61 T.C. 691 (1974). Attached to respondent'sPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011