Trans City Life Insurance Company, an Arizona Corporation - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         
          than the risk of future adverse experience.  If the reinsured               
          business was volatile or losses developed, and Guardian did leave           
          the reinsurance in place, the risk of loss would have remained              
          with petitioner.  Guardian’s unilateral right to terminate the              
          Agreements increased rather than decreased petitioner’s risk.               
               Throughout the duration of the Agreements, a negative EAB              
          represented the remaining surplus relief generated for Guardian             
          by the underlying agreement.  The amount of the negative EAB also           
          represented petitioner's outstanding liability for the ceding               
          commission payable under the related Agreement.  The moment that            
          the EAB was zero was important because Guardian would have had to           
          start paying petitioner profits from the reinsured business,                
          rather than crediting the EAB, if the agreement continued after             
          that time.  Petitioner had no meaningful control over the                   
          operation of the EAB.                                                       
               Each of the Agreements had a “funds withheld” provision that           
          was common in the insurance industry.  Such a provision                     
          eliminates unnecessary cash-flow and does not affect the economic           
          substance of the agreement or the risk that is transferred.  The            
          “funds withheld” provision in the Agreements avoided the need for           
          petitioner to transfer to Guardian funds equal to the ceding                
          commission, only to have Guardian transfer funds back to                    
          petitioner for the reinsurance profits.  As petitioner earned and           
          reported renewal profits from Guardian, petitioner simply reduced           
          its liability to Guardian by the amount of the cash that would              
          otherwise have been transferred to it by Guardian.  The “funds              
          withheld” provision provided additional security to Guardian, and           



Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011