Transpac Drilling Venture 1982-08, Albert D. & Luella L. Eshelman, A Partner Other Than The Tax Matters Partner - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         

          Churchhill Oil & Gas Company, Inc., a Texas Corporation, 2435               
          Faber Place, Suite 200, Palo Alto, California 94303."  On October           
          15, 1990, respondent filed an answer to the petition.                       
               On October 19, 1990, Mr. Haydon filed a Notice of Election             
          to Participate on behalf of the following Transpac partners:                
          Milton and Claire Chwasky, Donald A. and Maureen S. Cryan,                  
          Herbert and Hartwig Koenig, Murray A. and Adrienne Meltzer, and             
          Murray and Doris Dichek.  Sec. 6226(c)(2); Rule 245(b).                     
               On January 11, 1991, the Court issued an order assigning               
          this case to Judge Charles E. Clapp for trial or other                      
          disposition.  A copy of this order was mailed to the TMP at the             
          address provided in the petition but was returned to the Court by           
          the U.S. Postal Service marked "RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER           
          ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD".                                                 
               On April 20, 1992, petitioners filed a Motion for Summary              
          Judgment on the ground that respondent had failed to issue the              
          disputed FPAA's within the applicable period of limitations.                
          Petitioners' Motion for Summary Judgment was denied.  See                   
          Transpac Drilling Venture 1982-16 v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.               
          1994-26.                                                                    
               On May 11, 1994, the Court issued an order advising                    
          petitioners and the participating partners that documents served            
          on the TMP were returned to the Court as undeliverable by the               
          U.S. Postal Service.  The order, which includes a citation to               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011