Paul L. Tregre, Jr. - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and exhibits attached thereto are                  
          incorporated herein.  At the time the petition was filed in this            
          case, petitioner resided in Metairie, Louisiana.                            
               Petitioner and his spouse2 filed a joint Federal income tax            
          return for taxable year 1980 on April 16, 1981.  The couple                 
          timely filed joint Federal income tax returns for taxable years             
          1981, 1982, and 1983.                                                       
               In 1957, petitioner began working for Avondale Shipyards,              
          Inc. (ASI).  During the early 1970's, petitioner was the                    
          assistant superintendent of ASI’s paint department (occasionally            
          the paint department).  Petitioner became the superintendent of             
          the paint department in 1975 and remained in that position                  
          throughout the years at issue.                                              
               Besco Exporting Corporation (Besco) was a manufacturer of              
          industrial chemicals.  During the years at issue, Besco was owned           
          by James Tubre (Tubre) and Seligman Kahn (Kahn).  In promoting              
          its products, Besco routinely sought to gain "in the yard" status           
          with its customers.  "In the yard" status meant physical and                
          ongoing access to customer job sites.  This practice enabled                
          Besco to make first-hand field observations of the particular               


               2Petitioner’s spouse is not a party to this proceeding.                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011