- 3 - started breeding cattle in 1979, after they began receiving substantial royalties from an oil well that was drilled on their land. On their 1979 through 1994 Forms 1040, petitioners reported the following amounts from cattle breeding and oil: Cattle breeding Net royalties Year Income Expenses1 Net Loss from oil 1979 $2,690 $15,299 $12,609 $157,789 1980 3,862 68,964 65,102 172,379 1981 21,606 85,028 63,422 198,030 1982 9,562 70,297 60,735 226,610 1983 4,570 89,696 85,126 167,465 1984 12,020 108,025 96,005 190,019 1985 7,522 93,003 85,481 159,237 1986 13,984 80,162 66,178 100,317 1987 21,891 95,901 74,010 112,640 1988 5,135 93,455 88,320 142,692 1989 4,234 64,955 60,721 69,933 1990 - 0 - 67,998 67,998 72,048 1991 49,320 77,835 28,515 123,622 1992 13,550 90,689 77,139 114,921 1993 46,933 87,673 40,740 97,876 1994 36,053 67,698 31,645 49,011 Total 252,932 1,256,678 1,003,746 2,154,589 1Petitioners' largest single expense was depreciation. During the subject years, petitioners’ involvement in their breeding activity included worming and feeding the cattle, delivering calves, planting grass for the cattle, and maintaining fences. Besides petitioners, the primary individuals who worked in the breeding activity were petitioners’ two sons, Matthew and Stephen, and their son-in-law, Kim Little. None of these helpers received any compensation from petitioners for their help. All of these helpers worked full-time for other employers. Stephen and Kim also owned and operated other farms.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011