Kin L. Velinsky - Page 5

                                        -  -5                                           
               Respondent's notice of deficiency disallowed $30,773 of the            
          $58,430 of claimed cost of goods sold.  Most of the $27,657                 
          allowed by respondent as cost of goods sold was amounts Mr.                 
          Velinsky expended in connection with the production of a music              
          video (the video) made for a band called "The Replacements".                
          Respondent now concedes that, in addition to the cost of goods              
          sold items allowed in the notice of deficiency, petitioner is               
          entitled to an additional $149.45 for photography expenses.                 
          Respondent also concedes that petitioner has satisfied all                  
          elements of section 6013(e), except the provision of section                
          6013(e)(1)(B) that the understatement of tax is attributable to             
          grossly erroneous items.  Respondent's notice of deficiency to              
          petitioner was addressed to petitioner at 340 Centinela #A, Los             
          Angeles, California 90066.  Petitioner filed a timely petition on           
          April 1, 1994, alleging error in respondent's determination as              
          set forth in this notice of deficiency.                                     
                                       OPINION                                        
               Petitioner contends that since the notice of deficiency                
          dated January 7, 1994, was mailed to 340 Centinela #A, rather               
          than to 3402 Centinela Avenue, the jurisdictional requirements of           
          section 6212 have not been met.  The address on petitioner's 1990           
          Federal income tax return is 1385 Vienna Way, Venice, California.           
          However, based on an exhibit in evidence with respect to the year           
          1990, petitioner stated that the proper address for the notice of           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011