- 3 - argues that "there is a genuine issue to what I.R.C. �104(a)(2) states" and prays for summary judgment in his favor. There being no dispute as to any material fact, but only as to the law and its application here, the issue is ripe for summary judgment. The facts presented below are based on the pleadings, facts stipulated by the parties, and other pertinent materials in the record. These facts are stated solely for purposes of deciding the cross-motions. The stipulation of facts and the exhibits attached thereto are incorporated herein by this reference. Background Petitioner resided in Dallas, Texas, at the time he filed his petition in this case. From March 11, 1968, until July 31, 1992, petitioner was employed by International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). At some point prior to July 30, 1992; petitioner became eligible to participate in the IBM Modified and Extended Individual Transition Option Program (ITO II Program). In order to participate in the ITO II Program, petitioner was required to sign the General Release and Covenant Not to Sue (Release). Pertinent sections of the Release read as follows: GENERAL RELEASE AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE IBM ADVISES YOU TO CONSULT AN ATTORNEYPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011