Raymond R. Weigel - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          $360,000, but that a sale never came to fruition.  As of Novem-             
          ber 1, 1995, the date of trial, the Eudora property was encum-              
          bered by three deeds of trust securing obligations totaling                 
          approximately $650,000 to the Aurora National Bank.  Petitioner             
          believes his equity in the Eudora property to be approximately $1           
          million.  In addition to the Eudora property, petitioner also               
          owns his personal residence and the property adjacent to his                
          residence.  Petitioner testified that the property adjacent to              
          his personal residence has a value of at least $200,000.                    
               Respondent argues petitioner is unable to repay the moneys             
          advanced to him by Goshorn.  The secured loans encumbering the              
          Eudora property amount to $650,000.  Petitioner also owes                   
          approximately $400,000 for unpaid unemployment taxes for his                
          corporations; Goshorn, Racon, and Tek-Pak.  Additionally,                   
          petitioner is personally liable for $50,000 of unpaid debts of              
          Goshorn.  In total, petitioner owes various creditors $1.1                  
          million dollars.  Other than his testimony, the record is devoid            
          of anything to support petitioner's valuation of the Eudora                 
          property, his residence, or the property adjacent to his resi-              
          dence.  Petitioner bears the burden of proof.  Rule 142(a).                 
          There is nothing in the record to support petitioner's contention           
          that he had the ability to repay the amounts in question.  There-           
          fore, we agree with respondent that petitioner has failed to                
          prove that he owns assets that equal the amount of his debt.                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011