- 28 - 75 percent of the management fee rounded to the nearest thousand dollars. B. Whether Petitioner May Deduct Its Rent Payments to Mr. Cummings In Excess of the Rent He Paid to the American Red Cross 1. Contentions of the Parties Mr. Cummings paid rent of $97,975 per year ($293,925 for 3 years) to the American Red Cross for the 4200 S.W. Corbett St. property. Mr. Cummings sublet that property to petitioner. Petitioner paid rent to Mr. Cummings of $216,000, $250,000, and $264,000 for fiscal years 1989, 1990, and 1991, respectively ($730,000 for 3 years). Respondent contends that petitioner may not deduct more for rent than Mr. Cummings paid to the American Red Cross. Petitioner contends that it may deduct all the rent it paid to Mr. Cummings in those years. 2. Background A taxpayer generally may deduct reasonable rents paid for property used in a trade or business. Sec. 162(a)(3); Limericks, Inc. v. Commissioner, 165 F.2d 483, 484 (5th Cir. 1948), affg. 7 T.C. 1129 (1946). A taxpayer who rents property from a related person may not deduct more than he or she would have paid if the parties had dealt at arm’s-length. Sparks Nugget, Inc. v. Commissioner, 458 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1972), affg. T.C. Memo. 1970-74; Levenson & Klein, Inc. v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. 694, 715 (1977). A taxpayer may deduct only the fair rental value ofPage: Previous 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011