Carla J. Zimmerman - Page 2

          Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the               
          Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable years before the            
          Court, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of                
          Practice and Procedure.                                                     
               After concessions,1 the issue for decision is whether                  
          petitioner qualifies for relief under section 6013(e) as an                 
          innocent spouse with respect to the tax liability stemming from             
          her husband's Schedule C business income and expenses for the               
          taxable years 1988 and 1989.                                                
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the exhibits attached thereto are              
          incorporated herein by this reference.                                      
               Petitioner resided in Belleview, Florida, at the time she              
          filed her petition.  Petitioner and Charles R. Zimmerman (the               
          Zimmermans) were married in June of 1985, have not separated or             
          divorced, and continue to be married.  The Zimmermans have a                
          daughter, Brooke, born April 22, 1988.                                      
               Petitioner has a high school education and has no training             
          in bookkeeping.  Before her marriage, petitioner worked, received           
          Forms W-2, knew she had to file tax returns, and filed income tax           


          1  The parties agree and have stipulated that the                           
          adjustments for the taxable years 1988 and 1989 and the resulting           
          deficiencies, as stated in the notice of deficiency, are                    
          accurate.  Petitioner does not claim innocent spouse treatment as           
          to her own omitted wage, interest, and dividend income for the              
          years 1988 and 1989.  Petitioner does not contest any of the                
          additions to tax or penalty for the years 1988 and 1989.                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011