ACM Partnership, Southampton-Hamilton Company, Tax Matters Partner - Page 95

                                       - 53 -                                         
          book value was consistently adjusted to reflect the current ask             
          price.  This convention had the effect of ensuring that the                 
          bid-ask spread would be borne solely by the partner(s) that held            
          an interest in the Notes, directly or indirectly, at the time               
          they matured or were sold.                                                  
               Finally, unlike the policies governing the revaluation of              
          Colgate debt, there is no provision in any agreement for                    
          adjusting the book value of the LIBOR Notes to reflect changes in           
          the credit quality of the issuers.  As a result, any credit risk            
          would be borne only upon the sale of the Notes to a third party.            
               As a corollary to the Accounting Policies described above,             
          the partners agreed that in the event that any of the LIBOR Notes           
          were distributed to a partner before maturity, they would be                
          distributed at book value.  As a result, the distributee                    
          partner's capital accounts and outside basis would be reduced.              
          This reduction would result in the distributee in effect paying             
          the full origination cost and bid-ask spread attributable to the            
          distributed LIBOR Notes.  In connection with the distribution of            
          the BFCE Notes to Southampton, as of December 13, the                       
          partnership's assets were revalued.  The book value of the BFCE             
          Notes was adjusted to $10,133,540.  For financial and tax                   
          accounting purposes, Southampton's capital account was reduced by           
          this amount, resulting in a decrease in its ownership percentage            
          from 16.89 percent to 12.60 percent.                                        






Page:  Previous  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011