- 25 -                                         
          business days of its receipt of a notice that such a resolution             
          had been adopted, and (2) Amax was successful in its challenge.             
          If Amax timely provided the requisite notice of its challenge, a            
          panel of three arbitrators (panel), each of whom was named in the           
          1984 stockholders agreement, was to determine by majority vote              
          within 14 calendar days of that notice whether any action of the            
          Alumax board to which a class B director objected or any action             
          of the Alumax stockholders to which the Mitsui group stockholders           
          objected could have a material and adverse impact on the value of           
          the Mitsui group's stock in Alumax if it were to become effec-              
          tive.                                                                       
               If the panel were to decide that Amax' challenge was suc-              
          cessful, the action of the Alumax board to which the class B                
          director objected or the action of the Alumax stockholders to               
          which the Mitsui group stockholders objected would become effec-            
          tive immediately, and the Mitsui group would not have the right             
          to purchase any shares of the Alumax class C common stock.                  
          However, if for any reason the panel were not to reach a decision           
          on Amax' challenge within the prescribed 14-day period, it would            
          be deemed to have decided that Amax' challenge was unsuccessful.            
          If the panel were deemed to have decided or were to decide that             
          Amax' challenge was unsuccessful, the action of the Alumax board            
          to which a class B director objected or the action of the Alumax            
          stockholders to which the Mitsui group stockholders objected                
          would not become effective, and the Mitsui group would have the             
Page:  Previous   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011