ASAT, Inc. - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          corporation (the section 6038A issues).  As resolution of the               
          section 6038A issues could negate the need for a trial of issues            
          involving section 482 (section 482 was an alternative ground for            
          the adjustments), we conducted a separate trial of the section              
          6038A issues.  With this background in mind, the issues for                 
          decision are:                                                               
               (1) Whether section 6038A applies to petitioner for its tax            
          year ending April 30, 1991; and, if so,                                     
               (2) whether there was a failure to authorize petitioner as             
          its parent's agent under section 6038A(e)(1); and, if so,                   
               (3) whether respondent's determination under section                   
          6038A(e)(3), reducing petitioner's cost of goods sold by                    
          $1,494,437, was an abuse of discretion;3                                    
               (4) whether respondent's determination under section                   
          6038A(e)(3), eliminating petitioner's NOL carryforward of                   
          $165,147, was an abuse of discretion;                                       
               (5) whether petitioner may deduct consulting fees of                   
          $280,922;4 and                                                              
               (6) whether petitioner is liable for the accuracy-related              
          penalty under section 6662(a) for negligence.                               


               3  References to "abuse of discretion", unless otherwise               
          indicated, are in the context of a sec. 6038A analysis.                     
               4  Petitioner's entitlement to the consulting fee deduction            
          is not a sec. 6038A issue.  See infra.                                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011