Fred L. Baker and Lisa A. Powers - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
               financial operation, or venture and divide the profits                 
               thereof.  For example, a partnership exists if co-                     
               owners of an apartment building lease space and in                     
               addition provide services to the occupants either                      
               directly or through an agent.  * * *  [Sec. 1.761-1(a),                
               Income Tax Regs.]                                                      

          See also sec. 301.7701-3, Proced. & Admin. Regs.  Petitioners               
          bear the burden of proving that a partnership did not exist.                
          Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111 (1933); Demirjian             
          v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 1691, 1696 (1970), affd. 457 F.2d 1 (3d            
          Cir. 1972).                                                                 
               In determining whether a particular relationship between               
          persons constitutes a partnership for tax purposes, the intent of           
          the persons involved is the controlling factor.  Commissioner v.            
          Tower, supra at 286-287.  Since intent is a subjective matter not           
          readily discernable by a trier of fact, a court must rely on                
          objective acts as evidence of intent.  Burde v. Commissioner, 43            
          T.C. 252, 266 (1964), affd. 352 F.2d 995 (2d Cir. 1965).  Factors           
          relied upon by this Court include:                                          

               The agreement of the parties and their conduct in                      
               executing its terms; the contributions, if any, which                  
               each party has made to the venture; the parties'                       
               control over income and capital and the right of each                  
               to make withdrawals; whether each party was a principal                
               and coproprietor, sharing a mutual proprietary interest                
               in the net profits and having an obligation to share                   
               losses, or whether one party was the agent or employee                 
               of the other, receiving for his services contingent                    
               compensation in the form of a percentage of income;                    
               whether business was conducted in the joint names of                   
               the parties; whether the parties filed Federal                         
               partnership returns or otherwise represented to                        
               respondent or to persons with whom they dealt that they                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011