Estate of Bonnie I. Barge, Deceased, C. Richard Barge, Executor - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          based upon the cash-flow of the years 1983 through 1986.  Using             
          the partnership's tax returns and income and expense statements,            
          he first calculated that an average cash-flow applicable to a               
          25-percent interest was $341,000 a year.  He then concluded that,           
          because the partners received distributions of only 86 percent of           
          that cash-flow, a purchaser of a 25-percent interest would                  
          receive $293,000 a year.  He thought that a private investor (as            
          opposed to a forest products company or an institutional                    
          investor) would be the most likely purchaser of the undivided               
          interest.  He concluded that a private investor would capitalize            
          the estimated $293,000 annual cash-flow at 10 percent and add the           
          unrealized gain on the buildup of inventory resulting from the              
          Barges’ saw timber management policies to make a maximum offer of           
          $3,340,000.                                                                 
               Ebner did not consider that a potential purchaser                      
          unsatisfied with the Barges’ saw timber management philosophy               
          could force a partition of the property and, thus, escape the               
          Barge management philosophy.  Petitioner agrees that Mississippi            
          law provides for partition of real property.  See Miss. Code Ann.           
          sec. 11-21-3 (Supp. 1996).  If the timberland were partitioned, a           
          purchaser would pay an amount equal to the present value of                 
          (1) the cash-flow expected under Barge management for the period            
          until partition (minus the costs of partition, which would be               
          divided equally over the partition period), and (2) the value of            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011