Kim Beauchamp - Page 19

                                       - 19 -                                         

          Commissioner, 79 T.C. 888, 930 (1982).  The existence of fraud is           
          a question of fact to be resolved from the entire record.                   
          Gajewski v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. 181, 199 (1976), affd. without            
          published opinion 578 F.2d 1383 (8th Cir. 1978).  Because direct            
          proof of a taxpayer's intent is rarely available, fraud may be              
          proven by circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences may             
          be drawn from the relevant facts.  Spies v. United States, 317              
          U.S. 492, 499 (1943); Stephenson v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 995,              
          1006 (1982), affd. 748 F.2d 331 (6th Cir. 1984).  A taxpayer's              
          entire course of conduct can be indicative of fraud.  Stone v.              
          Commissioner, 56 T.C. 213, 223-224 (1971); Otsuki v.                        
          Commissioner, 53 T.C. 96, 105-106 (1969).  The sophistication,              
          education, and intelligence of the taxpayer are relevant to                 
          determining fraudulent intent.  See Niedringhaus v. Commissioner,           
          99 T.C. 202, 211 (1992); Stephenson v. Commissioner, supra at               
          1006; Iley v. Commissioner, 19 T.C. 631, 635 (1952).                        
               Over the years, courts have developed a nonexclusive list of           
          factors that demonstrate fraudulent intent.  These badges of                
          fraud include:  (1) Understating income, (2) maintaining                    
          inadequate records, (3) implausible or inconsistent explanations            
          of behavior, (4) concealment of income or assets, (5) failing to            
          cooperate with tax authorities, (6) engaging in illegal                     
          activities, (7) an intent to mislead which may be inferred from a           
          pattern of conduct, (8) lack of credibility of the taxpayer's               
          testimony, (9) filing false documents, (10) awareness of the                



Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011