Melton R. Boone and Geraldine R. Boone - Page 4

                                                 -  -4                                                    
            result from willful neglect; and (2) the failure was due to                                 
            reasonable cause.  Willful neglect has been interpreted to mean a                           
            conscious, intentional failure, or reckless indifference.  United                           
            States v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241, 245-246 (1985).  Reasonable cause                            
            requires the taxpayer to demonstrate that he exercised ordinary                             
            business care and prudence and was nonetheless unable to file a                             
            return within the prescribed time.  Id. at 246.                                             
                  Petitioners were granted automatic 4-month extensions of                              
            time within which to file their 1985, 1986, and 1987 Federal                                
            income tax returns.  The returns were due on August 15, 1986,                               
            August 15, 1987, and August 15, 1988, respectively.  Sec.                                   
            1.6081-4, Income Tax Regs.  Purported copies of the returns were                            
            not received by the Atlanta Internal Revenue Service Center until                           
            June 1, 1990.                                                                               
                  Petitioner testified that he mailed their 1985, 1986, and                             
            1987 tax returns on May 26, 1986, May 30, 1987, and May 24, 1988,                           
            respectively.  He contends that the returns were timely filed                               
            because they were deposited with proper postage in a mailbox                                
            outside the main post office in Perrine, Florida, each year                                 
            within the extended filing periods allowed.  He then argues that                            
            once the returns were placed in the U.S. Postal Service mailbox,                            
            petitioners' responsibility for their delivery ended.  As to what                           
            may have happened to the returns, petitioner speculates that:                               
            (1) The mailbox was tampered with by vandals or thieves; (2)                                
            vandals unbolted the mailbox from its base and took the mail; (3)                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011