Robert D. Booth and Janice Booth, et al. - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
               3.  Whether the corporate petitioners are liable for the               
          penalties determined by respondent.7  We hold they are not.                 
               Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the              
          Internal Revenue Code applicable to the relevant years, Rule                
          references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure,            
          and dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar.                       
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
          I.  Background                                                              
               A.  Prime Financial Partners, L.P. (Prime)                             
               Prime is a master limited partnership that was traded on the           
          American Stock Exchange during most of the relevant years.  Prime           
          was formed on April 16, 1987, under the laws of the State of                
          Delaware, to acquire the financial services and real estate                 
          activities of a group of Prime's affiliated entities.  Prime's              
          general partner is Prime Partners Limited Partnership (Limited),            
          an Arizona limited partnership, whose general partner is Prime              
          Financial Partners, Inc. (Financial), an Arizona corporation.  On           
          December 31, 1988, the outstanding stock of Financial and the               
          limited partnership units of Limited were held by Thomas G.                 
          Cummings, Jerry P. Franks, Anthony L. Tominac, Marvin D. Brody,             
          and Donald A. Waldman.  Joel Boyarsky and a corporation joined              

               7 With respect to the addition to tax under sec. 6651(a)(1),           
          the parties stipulated that Young & Young filed its 1989 tax                
          return untimely.  Given the additional fact that in petitioners'            
          brief they do not challenge respondent's determination of this              
          addition to tax, we sustain respondent's determination without              
          further discussion.  Rule 142(a).                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011