Michael M. Brennan - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         

          employment practices.3  Petitioner, however, thought that he had            
          a claim against IBM for infliction of emotional distress caused             
          by his hectic employment travel schedule and pressure at work.4             
               In exchange for signing the release and participating in the           
          ITO II Program, petitioner received a $52,169 lump-sum payment              
          (the payment or ITO payment).  The payment was based on years of            
          service and rate of pay.  At the time of signing the release,               
          petitioner attached a statement to it indicating that he was                
          submitting the release under duress.                                        
               For the year 1992 petitioner received a Form W-2 from IBM              
          showing wages, tips, and other compensation as $90,946.51.  On              
          October 13, 1993, petitioner filed his 1992 Federal income tax              
          return.  Petitioner reported the $90,946.51 as wages, subtracted            
          the $52,169 ITO payment therefrom, and attached a disclosure                

          3    Although petitioner did not file any legal claims against              
          IBM prior to signing the release, he did file informal claims               
          against IBM pursuant to the company's own internal Open Door                
          program.                                                                    
          4    During the 179-day period from Oct. of 1991, through Mar. of           
          1992, petitioner was traveling or away from home on business for            
          119 days.  On Mar. 28, 1992, petitioner suffered a nervous                  
          breakdown at his hotel room in Cincinnati, Ohio, and had to enter           
          an emergency room for treatment.  Upon petitioner's release, IBM            
          requested that he return to Austin immediately.  From Apr. 2                
          through Apr. 4, 1992, at IBM's request, petitioner underwent a              
          complete neurological checkup.  Upon returning to work in late              
          April, petitioner felt that nothing had changed; he was still               
          expected to travel at the same frenetic pace.  Following a                  
          difficult and pressured meeting with his supervisor, petitioner             
          submitted a request for participation in the ITO II Program.                
          Petitioner, in fear of experiencing another nervous breakdown,              
          signed the release on July 31, 1992.                                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011