Lawrence V. and Katharine T. Brookes - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          must receive an opportunity to present their case.  Brinkerhoff-            
          Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. Hill, 281 U.S. 673 (1930).                     
               Although petitioners did not receive notice of settlement,             
          they did receive notice of the entry of the decision in the                 
          partnership-level proceeding.  Upon entry of the decision,                  
          petitioners had 30 days in which to file a motion to vacate that            
          decision.  Rule 162.  After 30 days, special leave of Court is              
          required to file such a motion.  Granting a motion for leave lies           
          within the sound discretion of the Court.  Heim v. Commissioner,            
          872 F.2d 245, 246 (8th Cir. 1989), affg. T.C. Memo. 1987-1.                 
               A decision generally becomes final after 90 days unless                
          appealed.  Sec. 7481(a)(1).  Once a decision of this Court                  
          becomes final, we may still vacate the decision, but only in                
          certain narrowly circumscribed situations.  Helvering v. Northern           
          Coal Co., 293 U.S. 191 (1934).  Petitioners argue that a fraud              
          was committed upon the Court.  This Court may vacate a final                
          decision if obtained through fraud upon the Court, Abatti v.                
          Commissioner, 859 F.2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988), affg. 86 T.C.              
          1319 (1986); Senate Realty Corp. v. Commissioner, 511 F.2d 929,             
          931 (2d Cir. 1975); Stickler v. Commissioner, 464 F.2d 368, 370             
          (3d Cir. 1972); Casey v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-672.  If             
          the Barrister decision is to be vacated, however, it cannot be              
          accomplished in the context of petitioners’ affected items                  
          proceeding.                                                                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011