- 9 - Petitioners claimed utilities expenses in the amount of $2,937, which respondent disallowed in full. Mrs. Brown testified that Mr. Brown used the telephone in petitioners' home to arrange work projects and to receive calls regarding potential jobs. Additionally, Mrs. Brown testified that petitioners paid for water, telephone, and electricity at the Fruitdale shop. On the basis of the record in the instant case, we are persuaded that petitioners incurred allowable business expenses (i.e., expenses other than the personal expense of the first telephone line provided to petitioners' residence, see sec. 262(b)) to some extent for such items. Accordingly, we approximate petitioners' utility expenses to be $1,500 during 1991. Petitioners claimed bank charge expenses in the amount of $146, which respondent disallowed in full. At trial, petitioners provided no evidence or testimony to substantiate the amount or the purpose of the bank charge expense deduction that they claimed. Consequently, as there is no rational basis to approximate such expenses, we conclude that petitioners have not met their burden of substantiating them. Rule 142(a). In sum, as to petitioners' Schedule C business expenses, we conclude that petitioners have substantiated expenses in the amount of $158,038.52. We turn to examine the Schedule A deductions in issue. On their 1991 return, petitioners claimed Schedule A itemized deductions in the amount of $29,305. In the notice ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011